JuiceboxThe AI Recruiting Platform that learns how you search, so you source better talent, faster.
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Juicebox vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Juicebox is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Juicebox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2 vs 1.9)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR coverage
Choose Loxo if…
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Juicebox | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #39 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Juicebox 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Juicebox leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
JuiceboxLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Juicebox ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Juicebox | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | ChatGPT | #5 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Juicebox | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $99 per seat / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 7-day trial |
| Integrations | 100+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | — |
| Support | Knowledge base, Help center, Chat and email support, Priority support (email, chat, Slack) with 24-hour response times on the Business plan | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $116M raised | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Recruiters and talent teams searching for hard-to-find talent, from startups and enterprises to recruiting agencies. | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Juicebox
Free$0per seat/month
Starter$99per seat/month
Growth$179per seat/month
BusinessCustomcustom, annual only
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Juicebox
- quick online setup
- free starting option
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Juicebox vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/juicebox-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.