Skip to content
SlateIndex
JuiceboxThe AI Recruiting Platform that learns how you search, so you source better talent, faster.
vs
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Juicebox vs SeekOut

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SeekOut is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 2 for Juicebox, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Juicebox if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 25% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • quick online setup

Choose SeekOut if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 2)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
  • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
  • Strong for sourcing passive talent

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Juicebox SeekOut
Visibility score2%5.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#39#18
Share of voice0.5%1.9%
Mentions this run311
Positive in AI answers67%25%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Juicebox 2%

Juicebox 0pp · SeekOut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SeekOut leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.8%
7.8%
AI Mode
0%
3.7%
Perplexity
3.1%
4.4%
JuiceboxSeekOut

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Juicebox ranked higher
1SeekOut ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionJuiceboxSeekOut
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $99 per seat / mo$149 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo · 14-day trial
Deployment—Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure
Integrations100+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPRSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023
SupportKnowledge base, Help center, Chat and email support, Priority support (email, chat, Slack) with 24-hour response times on the Business planHelp center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan
Founded20222017
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaBellevue, WA, United States
Employees51–20051–200
FundingSeed · $116M raisedSeries C · $189M raised
Best forRecruiters and talent teams searching for hard-to-find talent, from startups and enterprises to recruiting agencies.Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel

Plans side by side

Juicebox

Free$0per seat/month
Starter$99per seat/month
Growth$179per seat/month
BusinessCustomcustom, annual only
Juicebox pricing

SeekOut

SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
SeekOut pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Juicebox

  • quick online setup
  • free starting option

    SeekOut

    • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
    • Strong for sourcing passive talent
    • Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Juicebox vs SeekOut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/juicebox-vs-seekout, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.