Keeper Security vs Stytch
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Stytch is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 2.1 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Stytch if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.1 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA/BAA or PCI DSS (SAQ-A) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keeper Security | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 2.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | down−0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #36 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 43% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · Stytch −0.19999999999999973pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Stytch leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keeper Security | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA/BAA, PCI DSS (SAQ-A) |
| Support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University | Email support, Community Slack, Dedicated Slack channel (Enterprise), Enterprise support SLA |
| Founded | 2011 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform | Developer teams building B2B SaaS or consumer apps that need enterprise-ready auth and AI agent authentication |
Plans side by side
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Stytch
- Good choice for a rapid MVP
- API-first platform with flexible building blocks
- Suits both consumer and B2B authentication
- Strong shortlist option for B2B SaaS
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs Stytch”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-stytch, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.