Keycloak vs Stytch
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Keycloak is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.6 versus 2.1 for Stytch, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keycloak if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.6 vs 2.1)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
Choose Stytch if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA/BAA or PCI DSS (SAQ-A) coverage
- Good choice for a rapid MVP
- API-first platform with flexible building blocks
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keycloak | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 2.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.3% | down−0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #15 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 2.1% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 43% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · Stytch −0.19999999999999973pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Keycloak leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keycloak | Stytch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #7 | #4 |
| Best identity and access management platform for startups | Perplexity | #6 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keycloak | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability | Cloud |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA/BAA, PCI DSS (SAQ-A) |
| Support | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak | Email support, Community Slack, Dedicated Slack channel (Enterprise), Enterprise support SLA |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California |
| Funding | — | Series B |
| Best for | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications | Developer teams building B2B SaaS or consumer apps that need enterprise-ready auth and AI agent authentication |
Plans side by side
Keycloak
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Stytch
- Good choice for a rapid MVP
- API-first platform with flexible building blocks
- Suits both consumer and B2B authentication
- Strong shortlist option for B2B SaaS
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs Stytch”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-stytch, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.