Skip to content
SlateIndex
KeycloakOpen source identity and access management
vs
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Keycloak vs Okta

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.

Choose Keycloak if…

  • Free and open-source software
  • Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
  • Top pick as a self-hosted option
  • Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool

Choose Okta if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 5.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 33% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
  • Market-leading IAM platform

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Keycloak Okta
Visibility score5.6%56.9%
Change vs last weekdown−0.3%down−0.9%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#15#2
Share of voice2.1%12.2%
Mentions this run738
Positive in AI answers33%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Keycloak 6%

Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.9%
68.4%
AI Mode
3.1%
60%
Perplexity
8%
53.9%
KeycloakOkta

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

1Keycloak ranked higher
4Okta ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionKeycloakOkta
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$6 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 30-day trial
DeploymentSelf-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availabilityCloud (SaaS)
Integrations—8000+
Compliance—ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4
SupportCommunity support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of KeycloakOnline support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans
Founded20142009
Headquarters—San Francisco, California, United States
Employees—5,000+
Funding—IPO
Best forTeams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applicationsOrganizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.

Plans side by side

Keycloak

Pricing not available.

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Keycloak

  • Free and open-source software
  • Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
  • Top pick as a self-hosted option
  • Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
  • Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
  • Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
  • Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives

Okta

  • Market-leading IAM platform
  • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
  • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
  • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
  • Strong security effectiveness

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.