Keycloak vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keycloak if…
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 5.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- Market-leading IAM platform
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keycloak | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.3% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #15 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 2.1% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keycloak | Okta |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #8 | #2 |
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #7 | #9 |
| Best identity and access management platform for startups | Perplexity | #6 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | Perplexity | #8 | #1 |
| Most affordable identity and access management platform that is still reliable | Perplexity | #5 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keycloak | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 5,000+ |
| Funding | — | IPO |
| Best for | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Keycloak
Pricing not available.
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.