Skip to content
SlateIndex
KeycloakOpen source identity and access management
vs
Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft's cloud identity and access management service
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Keycloak vs Microsoft Entra ID

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Microsoft Entra ID is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 66 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 63% of the answers that name both.

Choose Keycloak if…

  • Free and open-source software
  • Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
  • Top pick as a self-hosted option
  • Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool

Choose Microsoft Entra ID if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (66 vs 5.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 33% positive)
  • Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
  • Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Keycloak Microsoft Entra ID
Visibility score5.6%66%
Change vs last weekdown−0.3%up+5.2%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#15#1
Share of voice2.1%12.9%
Mentions this run740
Positive in AI answers33%45%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Keycloak 6%

Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · Microsoft Entra ID +5.100000000000001pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Microsoft Entra ID leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.9%
80.5%
AI Mode
3.1%
68.9%
Perplexity
8%
63.1%
KeycloakMicrosoft Entra ID

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

3Keycloak ranked higher
5Microsoft Entra ID ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionKeycloakMicrosoft Entra ID
DeploymentSelf-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availabilityCloud
SupportCommunity support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak—
Founded20142008
Best forTeams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications—

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Keycloak

  • Free and open-source software
  • Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
  • Top pick as a self-hosted option
  • Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
  • Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
  • Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
  • Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives

Microsoft Entra ID

  • Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
  • Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
  • Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
  • Top-ranked and recognised as a Leader among IAM providers
  • Strong for enterprise identity governance and hybrid environments
  • Advanced add-ons carry extra yearly paid subscription costs
  • Advanced features such as Conditional Access require paid tiers

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs Microsoft Entra ID”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-microsoft-entra-id, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.