Keycloak vs Transmit Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Keycloak is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 5.6 versus 0.7 for Transmit Security.
Choose Keycloak if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.6 vs 0.7)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
Choose Transmit Security if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keycloak | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.3% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #15 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 2.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · Transmit Security 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Keycloak leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keycloak | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | $50,000 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability | SaaS |
| Support | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak | Enterprise SLA with premium support |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | — | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series A · $543M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications | Large enterprises such as banks and insurers needing combined customer identity and fraud prevention |
Plans side by side
Keycloak
Pricing not available.
Transmit Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Transmit Security
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
- Noted by Gartner for specialized fraud prevention and CIAM architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs Transmit Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-transmit-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.