KissflowAI-powered enterprise no-code and low-code platform.
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Kissflow vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kissflow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 6.3 for Make.
Choose Kissflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 6.3)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA or CCPA coverage
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
Choose Make if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kissflow | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 6.3% |
| Change vs last week | down−5% | down−7.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #13 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kissflow −4.999999999999999pp · Make −7.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kissflow leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
KissflowMake
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Kissflow ranked higher
0Make ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kissflow | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Public and private cloud hosting | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Dedicated support throughout transformation, Training and enablement for teams, Hands-on implementation | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2003 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Wilmington, Delaware, United States | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Angel · $1M raised | — |
| Best for | Large enterprises and IT teams that build and govern custom internal apps on one platform. | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kissflow
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
- ease-of-use with structured workflow governance
- highly rated by business technologists and process owners
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kissflow vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kissflow-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.