Kissflow vs Retool
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Retool is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 29.9 versus 7.7 for Kissflow, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.
Choose Kissflow if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
Choose Retool if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.9 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 17% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kissflow | Retool |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.7% | 29.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−5% | down−4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #13 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 7.8% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 46 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kissflow −4.999999999999999pp · Retool −4pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Retool leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Kissflow | Retool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | AI Mode | #8 | #5 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #9 | #3 |
| What is the typical pricing model for Low-Code & No-Code software? | ChatGPT | #7 | #8 |
| Which low-code platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #9 | #2 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #13 | #11 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | AI Mode | #5 | #8 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #14 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kissflow | Retool |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Public and private cloud hosting | Retool Cloud, self-hosted, or air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 |
| Support | Dedicated support throughout transformation, Training and enablement for teams, Hands-on implementation | — |
| Founded | 2003 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Wilmington, Delaware, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Angel · $1M raised | Series C2 · $141M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and IT teams that build and govern custom internal apps on one platform. | Enterprises and business teams that want to build internal tools with AI while IT keeps governance, security review and audit trails. |
Plans side by side
Kissflow
Pricing not available.
Retool
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kissflow
- rapid business process automation
- conversational and agentic AI app generation
- unified enterprise process automation
- ease-of-use with structured workflow governance
- highly rated by business technologists and process owners
Retool
- Excellent for internal tools, admin panels, and dashboards
- Developer-first low-code platform
- Transparent, inexpensive pricing
- High developer satisfaction ratings
- Rapid assembly of internal tools
- Pricing rises as builders and users increase
- Overkill for simple apps or lightweight needs
- Free plan limits on users, workflow runs, and storage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kissflow vs Retool”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kissflow-vs-retool, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.