LangChainThe open agent platform to own your intelligence
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
LangChain vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangChain is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 1.5 for Tray.ai.
Choose LangChain if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or HIPAA or GDPR coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LangChain | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #12 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 2.7% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 18 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LangChain 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangChain leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LangChainTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0LangChain ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LangChain | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), hybrid (SaaS control plane with self-hosted data plane), or self-hosted in the customer's VPC | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Community forum, Support portal, Email support, Slack | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B, led by IVP | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Teams building agents that need control over models, context, memory and deployment, and the ability to test, govern and improve them in production | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
LangChain
Developer$0seat per month, then pay as you go
Plus$39seat per month, then pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, then pay as you go
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LangChain
- Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
- Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
- Suited to enterprise agent loops
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangChain vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langchain-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.