LangGraph vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangGraph is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 24.4 versus 1.5 for Tray.ai, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LangGraph if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (24.4 vs 1.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2022 coverage
- Production standard for stateful, multi-agent workflows
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 coverage
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LangGraph | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 24.4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #4 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 5.3% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 33 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LangGraph 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangGraph leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | LangGraph | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best AI agent platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #7 | #8 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | ChatGPT | #6 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LangGraph | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | SaaS in US and EU regions, plus self-hosted and hybrid options available on Enterprise only. | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, HIPAA | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | — | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Teams building long-running, stateful AI agents. | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
LangGraph
Pricing not available.
Tray.ai
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LangGraph
- Production standard for stateful, multi-agent workflows
- Strong engineering control for complex, cyclical agent logic
- Widely adopted open-source developer framework
- Best choice for autonomous AI agents
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding effort
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangGraph vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langgraph-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.