Launchpad vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.3 versus 4 for Launchpad, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Launchpad if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 41% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Multi-tenant, enterprise-ready B2B SaaS support
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.3 vs 4)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Launchpad | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 6.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.6% | down−7.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #26 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Launchpad +0.6000000000000001pp · Make −7.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Launchpad | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best low-code platform with AI features | Perplexity | #14 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Launchpad | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $1,000 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Managed cloud on AWS | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Onboarding and kickoff with a dedicated Provider Success Manager, Developer support via tickets and AI chat, 24hr platform run-time support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, MA, United States | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Best for | Software companies, service providers and startups building and selling AI-powered B2B SaaS applications | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Launchpad
- Multi-tenant, enterprise-ready B2B SaaS support
- Managed infrastructure outsourcing
- Built-in security and enterprise workflows
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Launchpad vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/launchpad-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.