LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
PlanviewStrategic Portfolio Management & Software Delivery Solutions
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Linear vs Planview
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 4 for Planview.
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 4)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
Choose Planview if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (86% vs 54% positive)
- Gold standard for massive enterprises
- Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
- Strong traditional project portfolio management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Linear | Planview |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.9% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #12 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 1.4% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 86% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Linear 0pp · Planview 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinearPlanview
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Linear ranked higher
0Planview ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Linear | Planview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | — |
| Support | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) | Customer Success Center, Submit a ticket |
| Founded | 2019 | 1989 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Austin, TX, USA |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $134M raised | Growth round (led by Insight Partners) · $25M raised |
| Best for | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system | — |
Plans side by side
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Planview
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Planview
- Gold standard for massive enterprises
- Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
- Strong traditional project portfolio management
- Recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- Suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Planview”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-planview, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.