LinkedInLinkedIn's candidate sourcing and pipeline tool for recruiters
vs
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
LinkedIn vs SeekOut
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LinkedIn is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 19.1 versus 5.3 for SeekOut, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose LinkedIn if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.1 vs 5.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (26% vs 25% positive)
- Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
- Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
Choose SeekOut if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | SeekOut | |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.1% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #5 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LinkedIn 0pp · SeekOut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LinkedIn leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinkedInSeekOut
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
3LinkedIn ranked higher
1SeekOut ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | SeekOut | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #7 | #9 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #18 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | ChatGPT | #1 | #2 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #10 | #22 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | SeekOut | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 |
| Support | — | Help center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Headquarters | — | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | IPO (NYSE) | Series C · $189M raised |
| Best for | Recruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates | Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel |
Plans side by side
Pricing not available.
SeekOut
SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
- Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
- Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
- One-click job posting to LinkedIn and other boards
- Basic LinkedIn integration and permission settings can feel restrictive
- Integrations may not work seamlessly in practice
SeekOut
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
- Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LinkedIn vs SeekOut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linkedin-vs-seekout, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.