Looker vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 8.3 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.3 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (30% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Looker | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 8.3% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #11 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 30% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Looker 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Looker | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #8 | #14 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #10 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #6 | #15 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #6 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Looker | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Google Cloud | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | — | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series E · $280M raised | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | — | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Looker
Pricing not available.
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Looker vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/looker-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.