Skip to content
SlateIndex
LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

Looker vs UiPath

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 3.5 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Looker if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 3.5)
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or FedRAMP coverage
  • Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
  • Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace

Choose UiPath if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 30% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
  • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Looker UiPath
Visibility score10.4%3.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#13#28
Share of voice2.5%1.3%
Mentions this run179
Positive in AI answers30%38%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Looker 10%

Looker 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Looker leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
16.1%
6.5%
AI Mode
11.5%
1.1%
Perplexity
3.5%
2.8%
LookerUiPath

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

3Looker ranked higher
3UiPath ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLookerUiPath
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Free; paid from $25 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentGoogle CloudCloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped
ComplianceSOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAASOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5
Support—Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum
Founded—2005
Headquarters—New York City, NY, United States
Employees—1,001–5,000
FundingSeries E · $280M raisedIPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised
Best for—Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform

Plans side by side

Looker

Pricing not available.

UiPath

Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
UiPath pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Looker

  • Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
  • Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
  • Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
  • Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
  • Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
  • Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
  • Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines

UiPath

  • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
  • Fast implementation times compared with peers
  • Rated Exemplary by ISG
  • Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
  • Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Looker vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/looker-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.