LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
RecruitBPMAI-Powered Applicant Tracking, CRM and Hiring Automation Platform for the Top Staffing Professionals
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs RecruitBPM
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 1.7 for RecruitBPM.
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 1.7)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
Choose RecruitBPM if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29 vs $149)
- You need more native integrations (200+ vs 100+)
- You need GDPR coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | RecruitBPM |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · RecruitBPM 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoRecruitBPM
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loxo ranked higher
0RecruitBPM ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | RecruitBPM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | $29 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 100+ | 200+ |
| Compliance | — | GDPR |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | Account manager and technical team training after subscription, Video training, Built-in knowledgebase, Email support at support@recruitbpm.com |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Eden Prairie, MN, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | — |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Staffing and recruitment firms |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
RecruitBPM
Staffing Agency Premium (monthly billing)$89user/month billed monthly
Staffing Agency Premium (annual billing)$59user/month billed annually
Essential (annual billing, lower price set)$29month
Premium (annual billing, lower price set)$69month
Enterprise (annual billing, lower price set)$169month
Essential (monthly billing, higher price set)$39month
Premium (monthly billing, higher price set)$99month
Enterprise (monthly billing, higher price set)$199month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
RecruitBPM
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs RecruitBPM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-recruitbpm, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.