LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Recruiterflow is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loxo if…
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 30+)
- 7-day free trial
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Recruiterflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Loxo ranked higher
1Recruiterflow ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Loxo | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #11 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | 30+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.