LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
SourceWhaleThe AI recruitment platform that captures everything, automatically.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs SourceWhale
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.3 for SourceWhale.
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.3)
- 7-day free trial
Choose SourceWhale if…
- You need GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | SourceWhale |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #62 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · SourceWhale 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoSourceWhale
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loxo ranked higher
0SourceWhale ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | SourceWhale |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | — | GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Round led by Blackfinch Ventures, with Downing Ventures participating (reported as £1.5m, undated) |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Recruitment, staffing and executive search firms that want to replace several separate recruiting tools with one platform. |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
SourceWhale
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
SourceWhale
- Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs SourceWhale”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-sourcewhale, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.