Skip to content
SlateIndex
SourceWhaleThe AI recruitment platform that captures everything, automatically.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

SourceWhale vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 0.3 for SourceWhale, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose SourceWhale if…

  • You need GDPR or CCPA or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 0.3)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • fast deployment and ease of use

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric SourceWhale Workable
Visibility score0.3%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#62#2
Share of voice0.2%7.2%
Mentions this run138
Positive in AI answers—44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3SourceWhale 0%

SourceWhale 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
34.1%
AI Mode
0.9%
29.4%
Perplexity
0%
26.7%
SourceWhaleWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0SourceWhale ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
PromptEngineSourceWhaleWorkable
What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? AI Mode#9#3

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSourceWhaleWorkable
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$299 / mo
Free plan—No · 15-day trial
DeploymentCloud-hostedCloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceGDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
Support—Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20202012
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingRound led by Blackfinch Ventures, with Downing Ventures participating (reported as £1.5m, undated)Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forRecruitment, staffing and executive search firms that want to replace several separate recruiting tools with one platform.Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

SourceWhale

Pricing not available.

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

SourceWhale

  • Strong multi-channel candidate engagement via email and LinkedIn automation

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “SourceWhale vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/sourcewhale-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.