LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
VincereAgentic AI recruitment software, built for modern staffing and recruitment agencies.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs Vincere
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.3 for Vincere, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (17% vs 0% positive)
- 7-day free trial
Choose Vincere if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | Vincere |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #65 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · Vincere 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoVincere
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Loxo ranked higher
0Vincere ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Loxo | Vincere |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #15 | #18 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | Vincere |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based and on-premises |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | — |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Investment round (announced) · $14M raised |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Staffing and recruitment agencies |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Vincere
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Vincere
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs Vincere”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-vincere, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.