LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
ZipRecruiterOnline employment marketplace connecting employers and job seekers
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs ZipRecruiter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
ZipRecruiter is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.2 versus 1.9 for Loxo.
Choose Loxo if…
- 7-day free trial
Choose ZipRecruiter if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.2 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (20% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- AI matching pushes job postings to over 100 job sites at once
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 3.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · ZipRecruiter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
ZipRecruiter leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoZipRecruiter
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loxo ranked higher
0ZipRecruiter ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Santa Monica, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Senior notes offering (debt, not equity) · $219M raised |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Employers that want a high volume of applicants quickly |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
ZipRecruiter
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
ZipRecruiter
- AI matching pushes job postings to over 100 job sites at once
- One-click posting and pulling applicants back in
- Publishes jobs and captures applicants across multiple channels
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs ZipRecruiter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-ziprecruiter, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.