Greenhouse vs ZipRecruiter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 3.2 for ZipRecruiter, and ranks ahead in 25% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 3.2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 20% positive)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
Choose ZipRecruiter if…
- AI matching pushes job postings to over 100 job sites at once
- One-click posting and pulling applicants back in
- Publishes jobs and captures applicants across multiple channels
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 3.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · ZipRecruiter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a recruiting platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #14 | #3 |
| What should a recruiting platform integrate with? | AI Mode | #2 | #6 |
| What should a recruiting platform integrate with? | Perplexity | #10 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | Perplexity | #9 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Santa Monica, California |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Senior notes offering (debt, not equity) · $219M raised |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Employers that want a high volume of applicants quickly |
Plans side by side
ZipRecruiter
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
ZipRecruiter
- AI matching pushes job postings to over 100 job sites at once
- One-click posting and pulling applicants back in
- Publishes jobs and captures applicants across multiple channels
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs ZipRecruiter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-ziprecruiter, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.