Skip to content
SlateIndex
LumarFind, prioritize, and fix SEO, GEO/AEO, & website issues at scale
vs
UnlighthouseLighthouse for your entire site
Comparison · SEO Tools · weekly run Nov 2

Lumar vs Unlighthouse

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Lumar is the stronger AI pick in SEO Tools: it has a visibility score of 0.8 versus 0 for Unlighthouse.

Choose Lumar if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.8 vs 0)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage

Choose Unlighthouse if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Lumar Unlighthouse
Visibility score0.8%0%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in SEO Tools#36#55
Share of voice0.4%0%
Mentions this run20
Positive in AI answers0%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Lumar 1%

Lumar 0pp · Unlighthouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Lumar leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.1%
0%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
1.3%
0%
LumarUnlighthouse

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Lumar ranked higher
0Unlighthouse ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLumarUnlighthouse
DeploymentCloud-basedRuns locally on the user's own computer; results are shown in a local server on localhost:5678.
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2—
SupportDedicated SEO and GEO professional services team with strategy help and regular crawl reviews, Customer success team—
Founded2010—
HeadquartersNew York, NY, United States—
Employees51–200—
FundingSeries B—
Best forEnterprise SEO, web accessibility and digital marketing teams running large, complex websitesTeams that need full-site Lighthouse audits, such as pre-launch checks and ongoing monitoring.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lumar vs Unlighthouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lumar-vs-unlighthouse, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.