Skip to content
SlateIndex
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
Microsoft Copilot StudioLow-code platform for building and managing custom AI agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

Make vs Microsoft Copilot Studio

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Microsoft Copilot Studio is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 33.3 versus 17 for Make, and ranks ahead in 77% of the answers that name both.

Choose Make if…

  • You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
  • Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
  • Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
  • Visual, no-code automation between existing apps

Choose Microsoft Copilot Studio if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (33.3 vs 17)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 41% positive)
  • You need ISO 9001 or ISO 20000-1 or ISO 22301 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or OSPAR coverage
  • Strong fit for organisations standardised on Microsoft 365, Azure, Teams and Dynamics

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Make Microsoft Copilot Studio
Visibility score17%33.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#9#1
Share of voice3.6%5.9%
Mentions this run2439
Positive in AI answers41%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Make 17%

Make 0pp · Microsoft Copilot Studio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Microsoft Copilot Studio leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
13.3%
40.6%
AI Mode
5.9%
24.8%
Perplexity
31.9%
34.6%
MakeMicrosoft Copilot Studio

Head to head in AI answers

13 engine answers name both brands

3Make ranked higher
10Microsoft Copilot Studio ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionMakeMicrosoft Copilot Studio
DeploymentCloud, hosted on Amazon AWSHosted cloud service run by Microsoft
Integrations3500+—
ComplianceGDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001ISO 9001, ISO 20000-1, ISO 22301, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, OSPAR
SupportHelp center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans—
Founded2012—
HeadquartersPrague, Czech Republic—
Employees201–500—
Best forTeams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide.—

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Make

  • Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
  • Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
  • Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
  • Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
  • Built-in AI agents for business workflows

    Microsoft Copilot Studio

    • Strong fit for organisations standardised on Microsoft 365, Azure, Teams and Dynamics
    • Extensive enterprise integration, scale and governance
    • Widely adopted for enterprise customisation
    • Pre-built connectors to Slack, Teams, Salesforce and other SaaS tools
    • Recommended as a leading enterprise AI agent platform
    • Reviews skew toward IT and admin utility

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs Microsoft Copilot Studio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-microsoft-copilot-studio, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.