MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Make vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17 versus 2.8 for OutSystems, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17 vs 2.8)
- You need more native integrations (3500+ vs 400+)
- You need SOC 3 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
Choose OutSystems if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 41% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #9 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 3.6% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 24 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MakeOutSystems
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Make ranked higher
0OutSystems ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Make | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best AI agent platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #13 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | 3500+ | 400+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
OutSystems
OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.