MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
SimThe open-source AI workspace to build, distribute, and govern AI agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Make vs Sim
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 17 versus 2.3 for Sim, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17 vs 2.3)
- You need more native integrations (3500+ vs 275+)
- You need SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Sim if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Technical control and model flexibility
- Self-hosting option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | Sim |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17% | 2.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #9 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 3.6% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 24 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make 0pp · Sim 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MakeSim
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
3Make ranked higher
1Sim ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Make | Sim |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI agent platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #12 | #11 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | Perplexity | #11 | #23 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | ChatGPT | #4 | #12 |
| Best AI agent platform with AI features | Perplexity | #1 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | Sim |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | Cloud-hosted, or self-hosted in your own cloud with Docker or Kubernetes |
| Integrations | 3500+ | 275+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2012 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | — | Series A · $7M raised |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | Companies that need to build, deploy, and govern AI agents across the organization with central control over access, spend, and data |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Sim
Free$0free forever
Pro$25per user/month, billed monthly
Max$100per user/month, billed monthly
EnterpriseCustomcustom, talk to sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Sim
- Technical control and model flexibility
- Self-hosting option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs Sim”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-sim, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.