MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Make vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.3 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.3 vs 3.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 18% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
Choose Supabase if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.3% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−7.8% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #16 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make −7.8pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MakeSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Make ranked higher
1Supabase ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Make | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a low-code platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #7 | #1 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #7 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Integrations | 3500+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.