Microsoft AutoGen vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft AutoGen is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 4.5 versus 3.5 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Microsoft AutoGen if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.5 vs 3.5)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
Choose UiPath if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Microsoft AutoGen | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.5% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #26 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Microsoft AutoGen 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft AutoGen leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Microsoft AutoGen | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best AI agent platform with AI features | AI Mode | #3 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Microsoft AutoGen | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Open-source Python library | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | — | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2023 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, Washington (parent: Microsoft) | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | — | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Microsoft AutoGen
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Microsoft AutoGen
- high-concurrency asynchronous multi-agent conversations
- enterprise-grade scaling
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft AutoGen vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-autogen-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.