Microsoft Entra External ID vs OneLogin
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OneLogin is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 10.1 versus 4.9 for Microsoft Entra External ID, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Microsoft Entra External ID if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Customer and external-user identity integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem
Choose OneLogin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.1 vs 4.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (19% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Microsoft Entra External ID | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.9% | 10.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #20 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 19% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Microsoft Entra External ID −6.799999999999999pp · OneLogin +0.09999999999999964pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OneLogin leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Microsoft Entra External ID | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is the difference between a identity and access management platform and a privileged access management tool? | ChatGPT | #9 | #1 |
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | ChatGPT | #6 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Microsoft Entra External ID | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001, SOC 1, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Founded | — | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, WA, United States | Aliso Viejo, California, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Secondary market |
| Best for | Organizations building customer-facing or partner-facing sign-in on Microsoft's cloud, including new projects that would previously have used Azure AD B2C. | Organizations securing workforce, customer and partner access with SSO and MFA |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Microsoft Entra External ID
- Customer and external-user identity integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem
OneLogin
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
- 30-day free trial and structured evaluation program
- SSO, MFA, provisioning and directory features in one IAM platform
- Robust app catalog and developer-friendly provisioning
- Vendor-agnostic, cost-effective alternative to Okta
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft Entra External ID vs OneLogin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-entra-external-id-vs-onelogin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.