Microsoft Entra External ID vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 4.9 for Microsoft Entra External ID, and ranks ahead in 94% of the answers that name both.
Choose Microsoft Entra External ID if…
- Customer and external-user identity integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 4.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- Market-leading IAM platform
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Microsoft Entra External ID | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.9% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #20 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Microsoft Entra External ID −6.799999999999999pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
17 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Microsoft Entra External ID | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | — | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | — | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, WA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 5,000+ |
| Funding | — | IPO |
| Best for | Organizations building customer-facing or partner-facing sign-in on Microsoft's cloud, including new projects that would previously have used Azure AD B2C. | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Microsoft Entra External ID
Pricing not available.
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Microsoft Entra External ID
- Customer and external-user identity integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft Entra External ID vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-entra-external-id-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.