Microsoft Power Apps vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 2.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 38% positive)
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
Choose UiPath if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Microsoft Power Apps | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 55.6% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.2% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #1 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 9.8% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 55 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Microsoft Power Apps | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| How long does it take to roll out a low-code platform? | ChatGPT | #4 | #1 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #1 | #9 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #1 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Microsoft Power Apps | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | — | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, Washington | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Microsoft Power Apps
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Microsoft Power Apps vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/microsoft-power-apps-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.