Mindtickle vs Quantified
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mindtickle is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 32.4 versus 1.2 for Quantified, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Mindtickle if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (32.4 vs 1.2)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 27017:2015 or ISO 27018:2019 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or SOC 2 or HIPAA or GDPR or 21 CFR Part 11 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong sales readiness, onboarding, and certification focus
Choose Quantified if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Mindtickle | Quantified |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 32.4% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #5 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 8% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 45 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mindtickle 0pp · Quantified 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mindtickle leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Mindtickle | Quantified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Sales Enablement platforms | Perplexity | #3 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mindtickle | Quantified |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted on AWS in US East (Ohio) or Europe (Frankfurt), with a logically isolated tenant for each customer |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 27017:2015, ISO 27018:2019, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 42001:2023, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, 21 CFR Part 11, CSA STAR Level 1 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Professional services, Success specialists | Team builds personas, scenarios and rubrics alongside the customer's team, Calibration of scoring with the customer's trainers, Hands-on help during rollout and a success team after launch, Email help@quantified.ai |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Undisclosed round · $281M raised | Seed |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise sales teams | Life sciences and regulated commercial teams that must certify reps and keep messaging on-label, such as pharma launch and training teams |
Plans side by side
Mindtickle
Pricing not available.
Quantified
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mindtickle
- Strong sales readiness, onboarding, and certification focus
- Effective coaching and skills development
- AI role-play and video coaching
- High user ratings on G2
- Free starting tier
- Opaque, custom pricing behind contact-sales forms
- Needs a sizable team, content volume, and budget to implement
Quantified
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mindtickle vs Quantified”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mindtickle-vs-quantified, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.