MonsterRecruiting
vs
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Monster vs SeekOut
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SeekOut is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 1.8 for Monster.
Choose Monster if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 25% positive)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Large-scale or hourly hiring option
Choose SeekOut if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 1.8)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Monster | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.8% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #42 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Monster 0pp · SeekOut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SeekOut leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MonsterSeekOut
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Monster ranked higher
0SeekOut ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Monster | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 |
| Support | — | Help center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan |
| Founded | 1994 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Weston, Massachusetts | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth equity · $58M raised | Series C · $189M raised |
| Best for | — | Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel |
Plans side by side
Monster
Pricing not available.
SeekOut
SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Monster
- Large-scale or hourly hiring option
- Employer accounts require choosing a paid posting or subscription plan
SeekOut
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
- Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Monster vs SeekOut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/monster-vs-seekout, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.