Moveworks vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Moveworks is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 6.5 versus 3.5 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Moveworks if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.5 vs 3.5)
- You need ISO/IEC 42001 or ISO/IEC 27001:2013 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO/IEC 27701:2019 or CSA STAR Level 2 or GDPR or CCPA or FedRAMP coverage
Choose UiPath if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 33% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or C5 coverage
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Moveworks | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.5% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #19 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Moveworks 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Moveworks leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Moveworks | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | ChatGPT | #28 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Moveworks | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, not on-prem, hosted on AWS in multiple regions. | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Integrations | 50+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 27001:2013, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, SOC 2 Type 2, CSA STAR Level 2, GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, FedRAMP | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | — | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2016 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | — | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $315M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises that want one AI front door for employees across IT, HR and other business applications, including ServiceNow customers. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Moveworks
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Moveworks
Profile in progress.
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Moveworks vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/moveworks-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.