OneflowSmart contracts that feel like magic.
vs
QuoterQuoting, Contracts & Payments
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Oneflow vs Quoter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Oneflow is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 16.1 versus 0 for Quoter.
Choose Oneflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.1 vs 0)
- You need ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
Choose Quoter if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 report coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Oneflow | Quoter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.1% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #7 | #51 |
| Share of voice | 4.9% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 27 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 32% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Oneflow 0pp · Quoter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Oneflow leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OneflowQuoter
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Oneflow ranked higher
0Quoter ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Oneflow | Quoter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Onboarding fee | — | $495 |
| Deployment | SaaS | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SOC 3 report |
| Support | Dedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tier | Help Center, Live support on every paid plan, Customer Success onboarding for Quoter activation |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Private investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias Ståhlgren | Seed VC, Cohesive Capital Partners named as investor |
| Best for | Teams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contracts | MSPs that need quoting, contracts and payments in one workflow |
Plans side by side
Oneflow
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Oneflow
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
- Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
- Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
- Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
- Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
- Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams
Quoter
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Oneflow vs Quoter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/oneflow-vs-quoter, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.