Skip to content
SlateIndex
OneflowSmart contracts that feel like magic.
vs
ProposifyProposal software that gives you control and insight into the close.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Oneflow vs Proposify

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 16.1 for Oneflow, and ranks ahead in 83% of the answers that name both.

Choose Oneflow if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
  • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
  • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
  • Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards

Choose Proposify if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 16.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 32% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
  • Visually rich, branded proposal design

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Oneflow Proposify
Visibility score16.1%41.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#7#2
Share of voice4.9%9.4%
Mentions this run2749
Positive in AI answers32%49%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Oneflow 16%

Oneflow 0pp · Proposify 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Proposify leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
50.9%
AI Mode
10.2%
39.3%
Perplexity
36.3%
33.9%
OneflowProposify

Head to head in AI answers

18 engine answers name both brands

3Oneflow ranked higher
15Proposify ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOneflowProposify
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$49 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 14-day trial
DeploymentSaaSCloud-hosted SaaS
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR
SupportDedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tierEmail and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support
Founded20122013
HeadquartersStockholm, SwedenHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Employees51–20051–200
FundingPrivate investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias StåhlgrenGrowth Equity - II (CB Insights)
Best forTeams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contractsBusy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction.

Plans side by side

Oneflow

Pricing not available.

Proposify

Build$49user/month (monthly); $39/user/mo billed annually ($468/user/year)
Grow$65user/month, billed annually ($780/user/year)
Scale$12,800year platform fee, includes 10 users; extra users $780/user/year
Proposify pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Oneflow

  • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
  • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
  • Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
  • Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
  • Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
  • Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
  • Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams

Proposify

  • Visually rich, branded proposal design
  • Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
  • Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
  • Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
  • Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Oneflow vs Proposify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/oneflow-vs-proposify, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.