OneReach.aiAgentic Orchestration Platform for the Enterprise
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
OneReach.ai vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tray.ai is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 1 for OneReach.ai.
Choose OneReach.ai if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or UK Cyber Essentials or HITRUST coverage
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 1)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or HIPAA or GDPR coverage
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OneReach.ai | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #58 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OneReach.ai 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tray.ai leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OneReach.aiTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0OneReach.ai ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OneReach.ai | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Dedicated Private Environment hosted in the customer's cloud or managed by OneReach, on public, private, government or sovereign infrastructure. | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, UK Cyber Essentials, HITRUST | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | 24/7 support is standard across managed, infrastructure-only and combined service models | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Denver, CO | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Private equity round led by LoneTree Capital (listed as Growth Equity by Caplight) | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises, especially in regulated industries such as government, finance and healthcare, that need many AI agents governed, costed and reused under central IT control. | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
OneReach.ai
Pricing not available.
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OneReach.ai
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OneReach.ai vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/onereach-ai-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.