OpenProject vs Wrike
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 0 for OpenProject.
Choose OpenProject if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Wrike if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OpenProject | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #53 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 26 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OpenProject 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Wrike leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OpenProject | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | On-premises or hosted by OpenProject in the EU or Germany | Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant |
| Support | Community forum and tickets, Email support (Basic and above), Phone support (Professional and above), Dedicated support engineer (Corporate) | Professional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support |
| Founded | — | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Accelerator/incubator investment (TechCode, minority stake) | Series B |
| Best for | Organizations that want open source project management with control over their data, including universities, public sector bodies, NGOs and companies focused on data sovereignty. | Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale |
Plans side by side
OpenProject
Pricing not available.
Wrike
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OpenProject
Profile in progress.
Wrike
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
- Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
- Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
- Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
- Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OpenProject vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/openproject-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.