Oracle APEX vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 1.5 for Oracle APEX, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Oracle APEX if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 38% positive)
- Bundled at no extra software cost with an existing Oracle Database license
- Enterprise-grade reliability
- Good fit for teams already using Oracle Database
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 1.5)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Oracle APEX | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.2% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #38 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Oracle APEX −1.1pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Oracle APEX | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #8 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Oracle APEX | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Runs inside Oracle Database, available on-premises and on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | — | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2000 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | — | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | — | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Oracle APEX
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Oracle APEX
- Bundled at no extra software cost with an existing Oracle Database license
- Enterprise-grade reliability
- Good fit for teams already using Oracle Database
- Database-driven enterprise application development
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Oracle APEX vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/oracle-apex-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.