OutSystems vs Pega
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 2 for Pega, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 2)
- You need more native integrations (400+ vs 200+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 20% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
Choose Pega if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 9001 or CSA or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or HITRUST or FedRAMP or IRAP coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OutSystems | Pega |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 40.2% | 2% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.5% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #2 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 8.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 47 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp · Pega −0.6000000000000001pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | OutSystems | Pega |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | ChatGPT | #1 | #8 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | ChatGPT | #2 | #8 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #2 | #7 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #2 | #10 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #2 | #7 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #2 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OutSystems | Pega |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans | Cloud (Pega Cloud, fully managed SaaS) |
| Integrations | 400+ | 200+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 9001, CSA, PCI DSS, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, HITRUST, GDPR, FedRAMP, HIPAA, IRAP |
| Founded | 2001 | 1983 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series F, led by KKR | IPO |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need governed workflow automation and decisioning |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
Pega
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Pega
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
- Recognised as a major enterprise CRM suite provider
- AI-powered decisioning and workflow tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Pega”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-pega, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.