PalantirWe build software that empowers organizations to effectively integrate their data, decisions, and operations.
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Palantir vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tray.ai is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 1.2 for Palantir.
Choose Palantir if…
- You need FedRAMP High or FISMA High or DoD IL5 or DoD IL6 or CMMC Level 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Included in ISG's evaluated vendor landscape
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 1.2)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 coverage
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Palantir | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #53 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Palantir 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tray.ai leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
PalantirTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Palantir ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Palantir | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Apollo deployment foundation used across highly secure and regulated environments, including FedRAMP, IL5 and IL6. | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | FedRAMP High, FISMA High, DoD IL5, DoD IL6, CMMC Level 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, HIPAA, GDPR | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | — | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2003 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Post-IPO equity round led by ARK Investment Management · $2460M raised | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Federal agencies, state and local governments, international organizations and private companies. | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
Palantir
Pricing not available.
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Palantir
- Included in ISG's evaluated vendor landscape
- Placed in ISG's Merit tier, not the top tiers
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Palantir vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/palantir-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.