Pega vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 2 for Pega, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Pega if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (20% vs 18% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 9001 or CSA or PCI DSS or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or HITRUST or GDPR or FedRAMP or HIPAA or IRAP coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pega | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.9% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #34 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pega −0.6000000000000001pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Pega | Supabase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | ChatGPT | #8 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pega | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (Pega Cloud, fully managed SaaS) | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 9001, CSA, PCI DSS, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, HITRUST, GDPR, FedRAMP, HIPAA, IRAP | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | — | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 1983 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 201–500 |
| Funding | IPO | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need governed workflow automation and decisioning | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Pega
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pega
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
- Recognised as a major enterprise CRM suite provider
- AI-powered decisioning and workflow tools
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pega vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pega-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.