PinFrom job description to booked interviews.
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Pin vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pin is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.9 versus 3.1 for Recruiterflow.
Choose Pin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.9 vs 3.1)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (120+ vs 30+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pin | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.9% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #22 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pin 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pin leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
PinRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Pin ranked higher
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pin | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $100 per seat / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Integrations | 120+ | 30+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support, Onboarding and training (Professional and Enterprise), Dedicated account manager (Enterprise) | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2024 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $3M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Agencies, founders, recruiting teams and hiring managers who need to fill open roles with outreach and scheduling handled. | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Pin
Free$0forever
Solo$100per user per month, billed annually
Professional$135per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pin
Profile in progress.
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pin vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pin-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.