PinpointThe ATS built for multi-stream hiring
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Pinpoint vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pinpoint is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.2 versus 3.1 for Recruiterflow.
Choose Pinpoint if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.2 vs 3.1)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 30+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO certifications or SOC certifications or ISO 42001 (AI management standard) coverage
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pinpoint | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.2% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #26 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pinpoint 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pinpoint leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
PinpointRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Pinpoint ranked higher
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pinpoint | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | 30+ |
| Compliance | ISO certifications, SOC certifications, ISO 42001 (AI management standard) | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | — | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Expedition Growth Capital · $22M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Organizations running several kinds of hiring at once across locations, roles, brands and candidate groups. | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Pinpoint
Pricing not available.
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pinpoint
Profile in progress.
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pinpoint vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pinpoint-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.