Planview vs Process Street
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Planview is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 1.7 for Process Street, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Planview if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 1.7)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Gold standard for massive enterprises
- Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
Choose Process Street if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA or AWS CIS Foundations Benchmark coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Planview | Process Street |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #19 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 1.4% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 86% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Planview 0pp · Process Street 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Planview leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Planview | Process Street |
|---|---|---|---|
| What features matter most in a project management tool? | Perplexity | #4 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Planview | Process Street |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted; data is stored and processed in the United States by default, with data residency in AWS regions including the EU, UK, Canada, Australia and the UAE. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, AWS CIS Foundations Benchmark |
| Support | Customer Success Center, Submit a ticket | Email and chat support, Dedicated Success Manager, Priority support |
| Founded | 1989 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Austin, TX, USA | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth round (led by Insight Partners) · $25M raised | Series A · $15M raised |
| Best for | — | Operations and compliance teams in regulated industries that run repeatable processes such as onboarding, audits and SOP-driven work. |
Plans side by side
Planview
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Planview
- Gold standard for massive enterprises
- Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
- Strong traditional project portfolio management
- Recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- Suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Process Street
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Planview vs Process Street”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/planview-vs-process-street, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.