ProposifyProposal software that gives you control and insight into the close.
vs
QuoterQuoting, Contracts & Payments
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Proposify vs Quoter
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 0 for Quoter.
Choose Proposify if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($49 vs $299)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Quoter if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or SOC 3 report coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Proposify | Quoter |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 41.4% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #2 | #51 |
| Share of voice | 9.4% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 49 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Proposify 0pp · Quoter 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ProposifyQuoter
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Proposify ranked higher
0Quoter ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Proposify | Quoter |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $49 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Onboarding fee | — | $495 |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SOC 3 report |
| Support | Email and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support | Help Center, Live support on every paid plan, Customer Success onboarding for Quoter activation |
| Founded | 2013 | — |
| Headquarters | Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada | Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Growth Equity - II (CB Insights) | Seed VC, Cohesive Capital Partners named as investor |
| Best for | Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction. | MSPs that need quoting, contracts and payments in one workflow |
Plans side by side
Proposify
Build$49user/month (monthly); $39/user/mo billed annually ($468/user/year)
Grow$65user/month, billed annually ($780/user/year)
Scale$12,800year platform fee, includes 10 users; extra users $780/user/year
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Proposify
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
- Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
- Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
- Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost
Quoter
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Proposify vs Quoter”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/proposify-vs-quoter, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.