Rasa vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 2.4 for Rasa, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Rasa if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 2.4)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Rasa | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.4% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #36 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Rasa 0pp · UiPath 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Rasa | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | Perplexity | #17 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Rasa | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-managed on-premises or private cloud, or managed service | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | — | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Free community support in the forum, Basic support via online portal with best-effort response during business hours, Premium Support with 24/7/365 response, Customer Success Manager and business reviews | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2016 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $70M raised | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Product teams in regulated enterprises that want engineers and business teams to build customer-facing AI agents on one codebase | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Rasa
Profile in progress.
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Rasa vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/rasa-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.