Relevance AISpecialist AI Agents for Every Task
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Relevance AI vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Relevance AI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 1.5 for Tray.ai.
Choose Relevance AI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 1.5)
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 700+)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- visual drag-and-drop agent builder
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You need SOC 1 or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Relevance AI | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 8% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #15 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Relevance AI 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Relevance AI leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Relevance AITray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Relevance AI ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Relevance AI | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | 2000+ | 700+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Embedded deployment team, Dedicated account manager on Enterprise plan | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A (unconfirmed, reported by Signalbase) · $37M raised | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise teams in sales, customer success, marketing and HR that want non-technical staff to build and run their own agents. | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Relevance AI
- visual drag-and-drop agent builder
- free tier
- prebuilt agent templates for sales, support, and operations
- hosted no-code agent builder useful for experimenting
- named best overall
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Relevance AI vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/relevance-ai-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.