Skip to content
SlateIndex
RetoolBuild internal software better, with AI.
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Retool vs Supabase

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Retool is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 29.9 versus 3.6 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 40% of the answers that name both.

Choose Retool if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.9 vs 3.6)
  • You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $25)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 18% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage

Choose Supabase if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
  • Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Retool Supabase
Visibility score29.9%3.6%
Change vs last weekdown−4%New
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#4#27
Share of voice7.8%0.9%
Mentions this run466
Positive in AI answers41%18%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Retool 30%

Retool −4pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Retool leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
34.3%
9.3%
AI Mode
22.4%
1.7%
Perplexity
33%
0%
RetoolSupabase

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

2Retool ranked higher
3Supabase ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionRetoolSupabase
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $10 per seat / moFree; paid from $25 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentRetool Cloud, self-hosted, or air-gappedHosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available)
Support—Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan)
Founded20172020
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesRemote-first, United States
Employees201–500201–500
FundingSeries C2 · $141M raisedSeries D · $1000M raised
Best forEnterprises and business teams that want to build internal tools with AI while IT keeps governance, security review and audit trails.Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend

Plans side by side

Retool

Free$0month per builder
Team$10month per builder, billed annually
Business$50month per builder, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Retool pricing

Supabase

Free$0month
Pro$25month
Team$599month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Supabase pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Retool

  • Excellent for internal tools, admin panels, and dashboards
  • Developer-first low-code platform
  • Transparent, inexpensive pricing
  • High developer satisfaction ratings
  • Rapid assembly of internal tools
  • Pricing rises as builders and users increase
  • Overkill for simple apps or lightweight needs
  • Free plan limits on users, workflow runs, and storage

Supabase

  • Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
  • Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
  • Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
  • Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
  • Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Retool vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/retool-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.